![]() This can cause confusion if you want to move the window or navigate to different parts of the software. And some items like the histogram have a window of their own. However, on opening a series of bracketed images, the HDR editing tools open in a new window. For example, upon opening the software, there is a single window that shows file management options. The only issues we have with the layout are the pop-ups and new windows. The layout provides you with plenty of working space, and you can easily access the tools you require. There are tools such as Tone, Structure, and Hue. On the right-hand side, there’s the main adjustment toolbar used to change the image parameters. So which program does it best? Aurora HDRĪurora HDR has a simple layout that’s user-friendly. The actual layout of the program is of great importance you need to be able to access the tools, apply filters, and change the HDR parameters easily. While 4 GB is sufficient, 8 GB or more will make the HDR merging process run faster and smoother. However, as with any HDR software, memory is a key component of the rendering process. You need only half the memory of Aurora HDR (4 GB). Although version 6.3 has a 60% increase in performance, the system requirements remain the same. Photomatix Pro 6.3 remains the better choice in terms of minimum system requirements. That being said, the other requirements aren’t too serious. Less than that and it will struggle to run. You’re going to need 8 GB of RAM to make it run smoothly. Is your computer up to the task of running the programs?Īurora HDR is certainly the more power-hungry software.Is either product particularly resource-intensive?. ![]() Next, we’ll take a look at system requirements.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |